Monday, October 25, 2010

NAR in Montana tries to BUY the removal of Transfer Taxes

UPDATE 10-27-2010:  Missouri (one of 13 states not charging transfer taxes) is voting to permanently prohibit transfer taxes - Many surrounding states take in millions of dollars, but nobody is saying what the money is spent on regarding real estate in the state...

Source:  http://www.columbiamissourian.com/stories/2010/10/26/surrounding-states-impose-forms-real-estate-transfer-taxes/

Apparently, money talks - especially when you want to change the constitution.

It is a noble effort for anyone to stand up and say "no more double taxation", but the NAR using money to buy the change is a little disconcerting.

Why wouldn't it be reconsidered and prohibited on its own merit? Ah, because it another "hidden source" of state tax revenue.  And in Georgia, "it's only $1 per thousand of sales price" which till amounts to double taxation UNLESS it specifically funds regulation and oversight of the Georgia Real Estate Commission, state regulators and other agencies directly related to the protection of real property rights.

So ask your State Representative and Senator "why is there a transfer tax and why can't we eliminate it?"

Source:  http://www.flatheadbeacon.com/articles/article/realtors_spend_2_million_on_real_estate_initiative/20243/

References to products and services are not a specific endorsement, but the user must perform their due diligence and investigate whether the product or service is right for them. I welcome any or all comments that would help others.

No comments:

Post a Comment